On 02/04/2020 22:24, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:25:46 -0400
Kyle Stanley<aeros...@gmail.com> wrote:
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Roughly speaking, the answer would be about the same in idea as
answers to the following questions:
[snip]
I would say the difference between this proposal so far and the ones
listed are that they emphasized concrete, real-world examples from
Well, but those are "done" changes which were backed by official PEPs
(except for unary+ which hopefully was there forever). While I kinda
tried to flex my arms in what it would make to write a PEP-like text,
it certainly nowhere there after me spending a couple of hours on it,
and collecting more evidence would take more time.
I think you may misunderstand. Before they were "done" changes, the
changes you listed (aside from unary +) justified being done by
reference to concrete, real-world examples that would be improved by
them. That's been lacking to the extent that it sounds like what you're
really saying is "I want to program $LANGUAGE in Python." Since that's
almost always a mistake, you've actually driven me from +0 to -0.5 on
the subject!
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ETFKOTYNQZ26NT2EO236PUX73YISQE7T/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
