> > So, neither "research" nor "production" seems to be a correct > > descriptor. > > Not even government funding agencies distinguish between "research" > and "itch-scratching" as long as you self-promote enough! :-) I agree > with Paul, feel free to call it "research"!
Along similar lines, when deciding what to write in the Type header of the PEP, I could choose between Informational, Standards Track and Process. None of those seemed all that perfect of a fit, though in the end I entered Standards Track. Maybe for his April Fool's joke this year, Barry Warsaw can add a Just Messin' Around type to PEP 1. :-) Skip _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/7BOHCDMFTMDEI64PTWMUDQPS4TJSICDN/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
