For example, the following code would report an error:
class base():
def foo(self) -> None:
print('Base!')
def placement(self) -> None:
super().foo()
class child(base):
def foo(self) -> None:
pass
foo = placement
child().foo()
RuntimeError: super(): __class__ cell not found
However, it would be OK if `placement` is defined inside the class:
class base():
def foo(self) -> None:
print('Base!')
class child(base):
def placement(self) -> None:
super().foo()
def foo(self) -> None:
pass
foo = placement
child().foo()
which prints:
Base!
I think it would be natural if those functions that was defined outside
a class, but then rebound into a class, can see magic variables like
__class__ that are only shared by those functions defined inside a class.
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GTTD2CSWNCSH2UW657YK3M7GPSUOKWYS/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/