Let’s say I want to write a lambda function with no arguments that’s connected to a button in GUI coding, will blabla.connect(()=>print(“clicked”)) be used or will blabla.connect(=>print(“clicked”)) be used?
Sent from my iPhone > On 30 Sep 2021, at 7:53 PM, MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > > On 2021-09-30 07:21, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 4:19 PM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 02:09:03PM -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>> > Over in typing-sig we're considering a new syntax for callable *types*, >>> > which would look like (int, int, str) -> float. A matching syntax for >>> > lambda would use a different arrow, e.g. (x, y, z) => x+y+z. >>> >>> I like arrow operators :-) >>> >>> But I fear that it will be too easy to misread `=>` as greater than or >>> equal to, especially when skimming code. >>> >>> Assuming that they need to be different arrows, how do you feel about >>> `->` for types and annotations, and `-->` for lambdas? Or `->>`? >>> >> JavaScript uses => for functions, and the confusion with ">=" doesn't >> seem to be a major problem with it. > C# also uses "=>". > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/CDYWUHFCMKR6A7J5C7K6KWITUJAUZWMI/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/HB3HZC4IIIO42YYQVTZGEZBCMYPOIVBY/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
