> > But I guess since method chaining (for collection pipeline) is more > > commonplace across many languages, it might be easier to catch on. > We should be careful about the terminology. Method chaining and > pipelining are related, but independent, design patterns or idioms: Noted and thank you! With that clarification, I meant to say that method chaining for sequence-like objects seems to be more commonplace across many languages and would be easier to catch on.
> In concatenative languages like Factor or Forth, you would write it in > reverse polish notation (no operator required): > obj func spam eggs cheese aardvark This is an awesome TIL :) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/3ME5NUXAQSMJCYOMOHG53OFGGF6BOBBC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
