On 11/26/2021 1:59 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
Just a note here:
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 6:37 AM Raimi bin Karim
<raimi.bka...@gmail.com> wrote:
to improve readability of chaining lazy
functions (map, filter, etc.) for iterables.
I think there is a slight misperception here. I've seen the term lazy
used a couple times, and at least once in contrast to list
comprehensions. However, there are, of course, generator
comprehensions (AKA generator expressions) which are also lazy.
So this is about syntax, not capability.
Another note: I'm not recommending it, but we could add a bunch of
things to the Iterator ABC, and then it could be available everywhere.
Is that true? I'm genuinely curious.
I have lots of code with is the logical equivalent of:
class Foo:
def __init__(self, s):
self.s = s
self.idx = -1
def __iter__(self):
return self
def __next__(self):
self.idx += 1
if self.idx < len(self.s):
return self.s[self.idx]
raise StopIteration()
Would adding something to the Iterator ABC really also add it to my
class Foo?
Eric
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/QKV2QNBFICYGYI7Z3PQLWI76Q25VZSQ7/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
