+1 On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 07:20 +0000, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote: > My preferred syntax for a frozenset literal would be something like > > {1, 2, 3}.freeze() > > This requires no new syntax, and can be safely optimized at compile > time (as far as I can tell). > > set.freeze would be a new method of sets which could also be used at > run time. It would return a new frozenset object and wouldn't alter > the set object (so perhaps the name I suggested isn't ideal). Of > course frozenset.freeze would just return itself. > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LYGTXEHMUVVPC3DAHUDLMKLP2574GX5L/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TG7HGCXR3OVR25GPSWXVDRROSUALBES6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/