On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 07:20:12AM +0000, Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:
> My preferred syntax for a frozenset literal would be something like
>
> {1, 2, 3}.freeze()
>
> This requires no new syntax, and can be safely optimized at compile time
> (as far as I can tell).
I like that, it is similar to a proposal for docstrings:
https://bugs.python.org/issue36906
This would be safe to optimize at compile time, so long as the contents
of the set were all literals. And for implementations that didn't
optimize at compile time, it would be no worse than the situation now.
Perhaps a better name would be "frozen()` since that doesn't imply
an in-place operation like "freeze" does.
--
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/B3GTIXHL6QBJP5BIBAPP2TUQ2EO3GNPO/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
