mystilleef schrieb: > Ken Tilton wrote: >> Lisp has all the cool qualities you like in your pets, plus native >> compilation in most implementations, plus maturity and a standard, plus >> a better OO, plus macros, plus a dozen more small wins. Including >> automatic indentation. :) >> > > Better OO? You mean the one that doesn't support basic encapsulation > and is retardedly cumbersome to use? There's a reason I said, I'd never > use Lisp for OO not even when I'm high. Gimme Python, Eiffel or > Smalltalk anyday, not the retarded add-on package bolted on CL.
What do you mean with "encapsulation" in this context? I am looking for something that Pythons or Smalltalks OO system have which isn't in Lisps... André -- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
