Robert Uhl wrote: > "Ravi Teja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Mark Tarver wrote: > >> > >> seems to show that Python is a cut down (no macros) version of Lisp > >> with a worse performance. > > > > By that standard, every other mainstream dynamically typed language > > for you is a cut-down version of Lisp with worse performance. > > Pretty much;-) > > Fewer features, worse performance. Why use 'em?
Usability. Especially when users quote a very significant difference here. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
