Joshua Kugler  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Known issue.  See:
>http://blog.extracheese.org/2007/07/when-json-isnt-json.html
>
>Neither project has fixed it it seems.  Not sure which is actually
>the "correct" way to do it, but it would be nice if they would agree.

I think it's pretty clear (not just from that blog entry, but from
the grammar at http://json.org/) that cjson is incorrectly decoding
"\/". Whether it's sensible for simplejson to be encoding '/' as "\/"
is up for grabs, but it's perfectly correct for it to do so, so one
shouldn't expect it to be "fixed".

-- 
\S -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
   "Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
        -- Arthur C. Clarke
   her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to