Russ P. wrote:
On Jul 29, 11:09 pm, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm getting this sneaking suspicion that you guys are all putting us on.
As I said in an earlier post, I realize that this would only work if
there were only one copy of "empty" (as there is only one copy of
"None"). I don't know off hand if that is feasible or not.
It's only feasible if you change what `is` means for this one bizarre
use case, which isn't a good idea.
You reply reeks of the kind of pedantic snobbishness that makes me
sick.
Well, if understanding what the `is` operator means is pedantic
snobbishness, then hey, go right ahead.
--
Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] && http://www.alcyone.com/max/
San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis
The doors of Heaven and Hell are adjacent and identical.
-- Nikos Kazantzakis
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
