On Jul 29, 11:36 pm, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russ P. wrote: > > On Jul 29, 11:09 pm, Erik Max Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'm getting this sneaking suspicion that you guys are all putting us on. > > > As I said in an earlier post, I realize that this would only work if > > there were only one copy of "empty" (as there is only one copy of > > "None"). I don't know off hand if that is feasible or not. > > It's only feasible if you change what `is` means for this one bizarre > use case, which isn't a good idea. > > > You reply reeks of the kind of pedantic snobbishness that makes me > > sick. > > Well, if understanding what the `is` operator means is pedantic > snobbishness, then hey, go right ahead. > > -- > Erik Max Francis && [EMAIL PROTECTED] &&http://www.alcyone.com/max/ > San Jose, CA, USA && 37 18 N 121 57 W && AIM, Y!M erikmaxfrancis > The doors of Heaven and Hell are adjacent and identical. > -- Nikos Kazantzakis
I fully understand what the "is" operator is, and I never had any problem with it at all, thank you. But then again, I suppose that depends on what the meaning of "is" is ... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list