On Fri, 2008-08-08 at 12:18 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote: > Curiously <smug grin> g is exactly how I'd planned on doing it > before trying anything. The one thing that puzzles me about > all the results is why // is so much slower than / inside > that Psyco loop. > > > Tim Delaney >
One possibility for the performance difference, is that as I understand it the psyco developer has moved on to working on pypy, and probably isn't interested in keeping psyco updated and optimized for new python syntax. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but last I heard there's no expectation of a python 3.0 compatible version of psyco, either. -- John Krukoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Land Title Guarantee Company -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
