In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Delaney, Timothy (Tim)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David C. Ullrich wrote: > > > f: 0.0158488750458 > > g: 0.000610113143921 > > h: 0.00200295448303 > > f: 0.0184948444366 > > g: 0.000257015228271 > > h: 0.00116610527039 > > I suspect you're hitting the point of diminishing returns with g, and > any further investigations into optimisation are purely for fun and > learning ;) No doubt. Hadn't meant to get into optimization, at least not here, but various people made various comments - when someone suggests this or that seems like I should try it. Curiously <smug grin> g is exactly how I'd planned on doing it before trying anything. The one thing that puzzles me about all the results is why // is so much slower than / inside that Psyco loop. > Tim Delaney -- David C. Ullrich -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
