On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:26 PM, drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 5:08 pm, Philip Semanchuk <phi...@semanchuk.com> wrote:
On Jan 13, 2009, at 4:31 PM, drobi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 2:37 pm, Philip Semanchuk <phi...@semanchuk.com> wrote:
I was suggesting getting posix_ipc or sysv_ipc to compile against a
compatibility library (Cygwin?) under Windows. It sounds like
you're
proposing something totally different, no?
It's not really correct to call Cygwin a compatibility library. It's
more of a separate system.
Thanks for the education; I'm obviously not very familiar with it.
In any case, the current version (1.5.25) does not support
sem_unlink
or shm_unlink so posix_ipc does not build. Cygwin 1.7, currently
under
test, will support these. I haven't tried it yet. I expect it will
work OOTB.
Thanks for the report. Strange that it supports the functions to open
but not close semaphores. IN any case, I'd be very happy if posix_ipc
or sysv_ipc would work with few or no modifications under Cygwin.
Cheers
Philip
I just downloaded cygwin 1.7 and posix_ipc builds successfully. The
demo appears to work.
Most excellent! Thank you for the good news.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
