andrew cooke wrote: > Chris Withers wrote: >> Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> I propose the following PEP for inclusion to Python 3.1. >>> Please comment. >> >> Would this support the following case: >> >> I have a package called mortar, which defines useful stuff: >> >> from mortar import content, ... >> >> I now want to distribute large optional chunks separately, but ideally >> so that the following will will work: [...] > > i may be misunderstanding, but i think you can already do this.
ah, sorry, i think i was misunderstanding. you mean within the mechanism provided by this new pep (which i also don't understand....) andrew -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
