Hendrik van Rooyen wrote: > "Diez B. Roggisch" <d...@nam.web.de> wrote: > >> >> I think >> >> lb = list(s) >> >> is good enough. > > It does the job, of course, but it is not a string method.
And that is a bad thing because of what? Also as list-comps are going away and are replaced by list(<generator-expression>) I'd say it's much more consistent when faced with the task of creating a list of anything that's iterable one uses the list(<iterable>) idiom. Diez -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
