Peng Yu wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Steven D'Aprano
<st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au> wrote:
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:54:47 -0500, Peng Yu wrote:

So python would not be able to accommodate my preference one
class/function per file?
Of course it does! You can do that RIGHT NOW -- just put one class per
file.

I.e., I have to use something like 'from spam
import spam' or 'spam.spam()',
How else do you expect to use the class if you don't import it?


or accept that the filename is not the
same as the class/function name.
So let me see...

You don't want to write "import spam; spam.spam()"
You don't want to write "from spam import spam; spam()"
You don't want to write "from Spam import spam; spam()"
You don't want to write "from spam import Spam; Spam()"

What exactly do you want?

When I define class spam in file spam.py, I want to call it by

import spam
spam()

If spam.py is in dir/, then I want to call it by

import dir.spam

dir.spam()

That's just not how Python imports work.

--
Robert Kern

"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
 that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
 an underlying truth."
  -- Umberto Eco

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to