In message <roy-0ed9f0.08443706112...@news.panix.com>, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <ib2vrb$3e...@lust.ihug.co.nz>,
> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> wrote:
>
>> In message <8jd3m9fr5...@mid.individual.net>, Neil Cerutti wrote:
>>
>> > On 2010-11-03, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
>> >
>> >> styles = [
>> >> ("normal", "image", MainWindow.ColorsNormalList),
>> >> ("highlighted", "highlight",
>> >> MainWindow.ColorsHighlightedList),
>> >> ("selected", "select", MainWindow.ColorsSelectedList)]
>> >
>> > Agreed, except cute stuff like putting those three items in
>> > columns is just as bad.
>> >
>> > Code should be utilitarian rather than ornate, Shaker rather than
>> > Victorian.
>>
>> Tufte’s concept of “chartjunk” could perhaps be extended to “formatjunk”
>> or “prettyprintjunk”.
>
> Not at all. Tufte is all about making data easy to understand visually.
> The chartjunk he rails about is colors, shadows, 3-d effects, etc, which
> make a chart "look pretty" but don't add to comprehension.
Precisely my point.
> If you take out the extra whitespace, you end up with this:
>
>> >> styles = [
>> >> ("normal", "image", MainWindow.ColorsNormalList),
>> >> ("highlighted", "highlight",
>> >> MainWindow.ColorsHighlightedList), ("selected", "select",
>> >> MainWindow.ColorsSelectedList)]
>
> which I think is more difficult to scan visually.
Not surprising, since the above list has become completely divorced from its
original purpose. Anybody remember what that was? It was supposed to be used
in a loop, as follows:
for \
Description, Attr, ColorList \
in \
(
("normal", "image", MainWindow.ColorsNormalList),
("highlighted", "highlight", MainWindow.ColorsHighlightedList),
("selected", "select", MainWindow.ColorsSelectedList),
) \
:
...
#end for
Does this make more sense now?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
