On Jan 23, 2:07 pm, rantingrick <rantingr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well then post a traceback.
None of these issues will supply a traceback; in fact, in some of these cases, you went out of your way to ensure that would not happen. That's an additional bug (or 5 additional bugs depending how mean your tester/QA staff are). > However you still miss the point. You will do anything to distract > from the point. And what IS that point? Well that Tkinter is > lackluster 20 years old rotware The fact it doesn't provide a control found almost exclusively in file browsers and open/save dialogs does not mean that it is "20 years old rotware". > and you need to resort to these BS tactics to discredit me because 1). You > cannot even create a Tkinter > GUI at the basic level, I certainly can, but there's no point in demonstrating my skill when you cannot create a wxWidgets GUI at a basic level. You made the challenge, you intentionally styled it as "rantingrick v. the world", so you need to actually bring something challenge worthy to the table first. That includes picking a challenge that's interesting and not over a relatively minor widget in the grand scheme of things. Qt, Swing, Gtk, and Win32 common controls[1] don't provide the same exact control either, should we view it as deficient? But regardless of the challenge, I don't think you're capable of posting a worthwhile example, which is why you dismiss all the problems found with it instead of actually fixing the code. > Post CODE Adam. Code! Surely you can handle copy/pasting a traceback i > hope! I certainly can. I don't have much hope for you writing code that provides tracebacks, much less actually useful ones. Adam [1] Hell, I'm not sure /any/ toolkit provides the whole of wxListCtrl functionality OOB, besides wxWidgets itself. Like I said, it's specific functionality isn't well suited. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
