Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 27/09/2012 17:16, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:11:13 -0400, Devin Jeanpierre wrote:
Summary of that article:
"Sure, you have all these legitimate concerns, but look, cake!"
Did you read the article or just make up a witty response? If so, you
half succeeded.
It's more like, "Well, maybe, your concerns *might* be legitimate, but I
don't think so because..." and then he gives half a dozen or more
reasons
why Python is in no danger. None of which involve cake, although one of
them did involve Raspberry Pi. An easy mistake to make.
Haha! :)
Well, I don't agree. But let me explain.
[snipped]
The article Steven D'Aprano referred to is not a direct response to the
article I referred to, yet your words are written as if it were. May I
ask why? Or have I missed something?
The second article didn't reference the first directly, but was aimed at
that general type of article. At any rate, Steven wrote as if it were a
direct response.
~Ethan~
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
