On Tuesday, 2 October 2012 22:13:20 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 02/10/2012 17:12, Ramchandra Apte wrote: > > > On Monday, 1 October 2012 13:47:50 UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote: > > >> On 01/10/2012 01:58, 88888 Dihedral wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> Your question seems vague to me. If you know you are storing > > >> > > >>> only immutable tuples in a list, then the way to iterate is simple. > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Does Python have a magic method that let's me use mutable tuples? I'd > > >> > > >> also like immutable lists. Is it worth raising a feature request on the > > >> > > >> bug tracker? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> > > >> Cheers. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Mark Lawrence. > > > > > > Mark, you are talking to a bot. > > > > > > > What happened to freedom of speech? If I want to talk to a bot, I'll > > talk to a bot. Besides I'm not convinced it/he/she is a bot. Plus if > > you read my post carefully, add in several years experience of Python > > the language and Python the comedy, you might come to the conclusion > > that a certain amount of urine extraction was going on :) > > > > -- > > Cheers. > > > > Mark Lawrence.
Never said you can't. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
