On Sat, 15 Jun 2013 21:29:35 +1000 Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> wrote: > > Bah. Plenty of us like both. In the inbox alerts me that someone > > replied to _my_ post, and in the python mail gets it nicely > > threaded. > > Your mail client doesn't alert you to a message addressed to you?
Every message in my mailbox is addressed to me otherwise I wouldn't get it. Do you mean the To: line? Which address? I have about a dozen addresses not counting the plus sign addresses like the one you use for this list. Which one should I treat as special? > > Sorry, I could have sworn you said you weren't using a mail client > > for this... > > As I already said, this is demonstrating the fact that “reply to all” > is broken even for the use case of participating via email. As the person who proposed this I would like to point out that I never suggested "reply to all”. I suggested including the poster that you are replying to. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <da...@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 788 2246 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. IM: da...@vex.net, VOIP: sip:da...@vex.net -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
