On 1/7/2014 8:34 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 23:14:07 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Memory: Point 2. A *design goal* of FSR was to save memory relative to UTF-32, which is what you apparently prefer. Your examples show that FSF successfully met its design goal. But you call that success, saving memory, 'wrong'. On what basis?
Point 2: This Flexible String Representation does no "effectuate" any memory optimization. It only succeeds to do the opposite of what a corrrect usage of utf* do.
Since the FSF *was* successful in saving memory, and indeed shrank the Python binary by about a megabyte, I have no idea what you mean.
-- Terry Jan Reedy -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
