On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:01:46 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > As far as "x is None" is concerned, a key piece of information is > presented on <URL: http://docs.python.org/3.2/library/constants.html>: > > None > The sole value of the type NoneType. ^^^^
Sole, adj. "being the only one; single and isolated from others", e.g. "the sole heir", "the sole example". In plain English, None is the sole (only, single) instance of its type. In computer science jargon, None is a singleton. > Thus, there might still be a nagging concern that a second NoneType > object x such that > > x == None and x is not None > > could crop up (from native code, perhaps). If that were possible, then None would not be the sole instance of its type. Since None is documented as being a singleton, that would be a bad bug. -- Steven -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
