On 04/04/2014 03:29, Mark H Harris wrote:
Now, about Python2. It has not died. It appears to be 'useful'.
The perceived reality is that Python2 is 'useful'. Or, is it as I
perceive it, python2 is embedded in so many places that it must be
maintained for a long time because so many code(s) will break otherwise?
Not so much 'useful' as 'used,' so that it is never sacked.
Or, is it really that python2 is so much more 'suitable for a particular
purpose' ('useful') that certain folks just don't want to use python3?
Beats me; the community will have to decide.
For a lot of people, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
