Le vendredi 30 mai 2014 18:15:09 UTC+2, Rustom Mody a écrit : > On Friday, May 30, 2014 8:36:54 PM UTC+5:30, wxjm...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > Out of curiosity. > > > Are you the Rusi Mody attempting to dive in Xe(La)TeX? > > > > Yeah :-) > > > > As my blog posts labelled unicode will indicate I am a fan of using > > unicode in program source: > > http://blog.languager.org/search/label/Unicode > > > > Of course it is not exactly a coincidence that I used APL a bit in my > > early days. At that time it was great fun though we did not take it > > seriously.* > > > > It is now about time that we stop taking ASCII seriously!! > > > > And for those who dont know xetex, its is really xɘtex – a pictorial > > anagram if written as XƎTEX > > > > However in all fairness I should say that I cannot seem to find my > > way to that promised land yet: > > - xetex does not quite work whereas pdflatex works smoothly > > - mathjax is awesome however its firmly latex (not xetex) based > > > > ------------------- > > * And the fact that there are recent implementations including web ones means > its by no means dead: > > http://baruchel.hd.free.fr/apps/apl/ >
> which I think unicode aficionados will enjoy ========= Ok, thanks for the answer. "xetex does not quite work whereas pdflatex works smoothly" ? jmf -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
