On 10/06/2014 08:27, Thomas Rachel wrote:
Am 08.06.2014 05:58 schrieb Rustom Mody:

Some people┬╣ think that gotos are a code-smell.
 ┬╣ I am not exactly those people.
A chap called E W Dijkstra made the statement: "Goto statement considered
harmful" and became famous.

And became widely misunderstood. If anybody would read the whole what he
wrote, people would learn that he doesn't criticise the *use* of goto,
but he wants the *replacement* of goto with something else (like

As C doesn't have exceptions, goto is in many cases the simplest and
easiest way of handling errors.

Essentially, you can write both good and bad code both with and without


I entirely agree. I find it incredible that some people find it so difficult to differentiate having tens or even hundreds of gotos leaping around willy nilly to a similar number of labels, and a similar number of gotos targetted at one label called SNAFU or whatever.

My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection 
is active.


Reply via email to