reasonable, but I don't like the close parens on the same line; even
>
> if this syntax is allowed, I'd frown on it in style guides,
>
thanks, bu what exactly do you find unlikeable in this syntax? the ")" is no
new syntax, but simply a match for a previous "("; and you can put it anywhere
because the "(" contents are space-insensitive:
this would be a syntax error:
a = def():
print("gvr")
this too:
a = def():
print("anon")
but not this:
a = (def():
print("no")
)
neither this:
a = (def():
print("d"))
nor this:
a = (def():
print( "no" )
)
we're all grown-ups, aren't we? if we wanted to mess the syntax up then "("
alone would have let us do obscene things like:
if (a
==
b): gvr()
or
a =(1, 2
5
)
and we also could fiddle with an instance's (or class's) intendedly private
members (no pun) but
did we ever do?
yours truly would be glad to know your thoughts on this
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
