On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 8:55:27 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 17/03/2015 03:18, Rustom Mody wrote: > > On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 8:37:25 AM UTC+5:30, Mark Lawrence wrote: > >>> > >>> Ok Let me throw out a suggestion: > >>> - potato is a generator > >>> - tomato is a cursor. > >>> Acceptable? > >>> > >> > >> No. In Python potato is a generator function, tomato is a generator. > >> Why complicate something that is so simple? I couldn't care less what > >> they are called in any other language. > > > > Ok so lets see... > > https://docs.python.org/3.4/tutorial/classes.html#generators > > https://docs.python.org/3.4/glossary.html#term-generator > > > > Are these consistent with (your notion of) python? > > Maybe they are "any other language"? > > > > I'll already suggested you write the patches and put them on the bug > tracker. If you can't be bothered please have the courtesy to stop > bleating about it.
Here are two of your posts (within a couple of hours) 1. > So the docs are confused and inconsistent but in an open source > community it's not *MY* responsibility to deal with it, somebody else can. > Making mountains out of mole hills is all I see in this entire thread. 2. > No. In Python potato is a generator function, tomato is a generator. > Why complicate something that is so simple? I couldn't care less what > they are called in any other language. I understand the first as saying: "Since something is wrong correct it; Dont bleat!" The second is saying "Nothing is wrong!" Please decide which side you belong -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
