Random832 wrote: > This makes sense for the change from "old" to "new (was: old)", > which nobody was advocating against (after all, there's semantic > content - they wouldn't have changed the subject line if they > didn't consider it a new discussion topic), but I think there is > a reasonable argument that changing it a second time from > "new (was: old)" to "new" is frivolous.
Nonsense. It is complete nonsense to carry around the old Subject for the rest of the thread. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
