Steve D'Aprano wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 07:07 am, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: > >> Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu>: >> >>> On 11/29/2016 9:25 AM, Frank Millman wrote: >>> >>>> Is there any technical reason for this, or is it just that no-one has >>>> got around to writing an asynchronous version yet? >>> >>> Google's first hit for 'aenumerate' is >>> > https://pythonwise.blogspot.com/2015/11/aenumerate-enumerate-for-async-for.html >> >> Ok, so how about: >> >> aall(aiterable) >> aany(aiterable) >> class abytearray(aiterable[, encoding[, errors]]) > [...] > > > What about them? What's your question?
Well, my questions as someone who hasn't touched the async stuff so far would be: Is there a viable approach to provide (a) support for async without duplicating the stdlib (b) a reasonably elegant way to access the async versions I hope we can agree that prepending an "a" to the name should be the last resort. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
