On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Steve D'Aprano <steve+pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: > By the way, thanks for raising this interesting question! This is exactly > the sort of thing that the secrets module is supposed to make a "no > brainer", so I expect that it will get a password hash function.
+1. Please can we see something like Werkzeug's functions added? They're the no-brainer option for anything that already has Werkzeug as a dependency (eg Flask apps), and if that were in the stdlib, they'd be the no-brainer option for 3.7+ programs. Should I take this to -ideas? ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list