On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 8:32 AM, bartc <b...@freeuk.com> wrote:
> So I'll keep it generic. Let's say the Tiny C compiler is not taken
> seriously because it might be a couple of times slower than gcc-O3, even
> thought it's 1% of the size and compiles 1000% as fast.

Except that nobody has said that. You're doing an excellent job of
fighting against a strawman.

I'm done. Have fun!


Reply via email to