In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, bruno at modulix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: >(snip) >> I think you're taking Python's OO-ness too seriously. One of the >> strengths of Python is that it can _look_ like an OO language without >> actually being OO. > >According to which definition of OO ? Isn't there one? -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
