Hi Shavkat, Emmanuel and Python-MEEP users, Thanks for your prompt responses. I got the impression that our dear colleagues in UGent/Imec have deeply integrated Python-meep into the on-developing IPKISS package. From the online IPython notebooks, however, there is no clear examples on how to use Python-MEEP under the framework of IPKISS.
I have experiences of using Lumerical, Crosslight and RSoft's photonic simulation products. It seems that our friends in UGent/Imec would like to make another commercial software for integrate circuit simulations and designs. Based on my experiences, I feel that, to promote IPKISS as competitive as other commercial products, there is still a long way to go (CAD interface, quantum effects calculation and so on). As an open-source fun, I am glad to notice that UGent/Imec have provided a free access version of IPKISS which is an integration of some released open-source packages, from my perspective. I personally appreciate your generous endeavor. I don't know if the free version is functional enough to run basic design tasks independently in a personal computer, but I would like to take a look further. I and many of my colleagues in the field of Quantum Information and Quantum Control are also naively thinking of resorting to the open-source community to integrate some well-known open-source works into an consistent framework. This may further include quantum circuit simulations, multi-level quantum system dynamics, quantum tomography, optimal design and photonic integration, as well as other possible directions. We plan to only provide interfaces to integrate all these elements based on the existed open-source projects, and all our work will be as the same as the elements we connect to be fully free and open-source. Initial proposals may be discussed in our annual conference of SQuIT. The main idea is to promote the evolution of photonic innovation and quantum information processing to a new level by bringing in a platform that everyone can contribute to make some toolboxes well-used and easy to use. At this moment, I don't know if IPKISS is also aiming to collect this kind of efforts and would like to provide a fully functional open source version to the scientific community. If so, I and my colleagues will be glad to consider the next step to call for more efforts to make IPKISS which has integrated Python-MEEP and other open source tools well developped and extensible to a larger community. For now, Python is a good interface language to realize this goal. Commericalizing is also welcome based on open-source endeavors. Coordially, Qi On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Emmanuel Lambert <[email protected]>wrote: > hi > > IPKISS and Python-Meep have been deeply integrated : the original > driver to develop Python-Meep was to integrate Meep with IPKISS. The > integration code is proprietary for UGent/Imec and should be combined > with a "virtual fabrication" routine : it is not part of the public > IPKISS code, but maybe you can get access to it in the context of a > collaboration. > > Read this paper : http://photonics.intec.ugent.be/download/pub_3132.pdf > > Please contact one of the following persons for information about this : > [email protected] > [email protected] > [email protected] > > BR > Emmanuel > > 2013/10/29 Nizamov Shawkat <[email protected]>: > > Hello, > > > > It is true that there is no activity on python-meep (at least since > years on > > my side). It was a project which originated from my fellowship at MSU and > > since then my interests lie in different area. Regarding the IPKSS - I do > > not know whether it has a python-meep as a dependency or has directly > > embedded it. IPKISS is much more than the wrapper around meep and is > > actively developed. That's why I would suggest you to go IPKISS way and > use > > python-meep only if you want to continue its development. > > > > Best regards, > > Shavkat Nizamov > > > > > > 2013/10/28 Xiaodong <[email protected]> > >> > >> Dear Python-meep developers, > >> > >> I notice that the IPKISS may have integrated the Python-meep code. Does > >> that mean Python-meep has been stopped maintaining since IPKISS was > >> released? Any update on Python-meep since the IPKISS was released last > year? > >> Seems Python-meep has not been active for a long time, while IPKISS > keeps > >> updating in the past year. I just worry about which python interface > should > >> I use for FDTD simulations... Thanks. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Qi > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~python-meep > >> Post to : [email protected] > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~python-meep > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~python-meep > > Post to : [email protected] > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~python-meep > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~python-meep Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~python-meep More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
