On Mar 25, 2011, at 09:51 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote: >while considering the request valid, even if the current >non-indent is an option, > >what's the recommendable indent? > >Would not choose the block-indent step, rather signal >it's something different at stake. > >What about indenting it to the end of first element of >previous line? > >;;;;;;;;;;; >(longer, sequence, of_items, > that, needs, to_be, wrapped) = input_list > >packed_entry = (long, sequence, of_items, > that, needs, to_be, wrapped) >;;;;;;;;;;
I must be missing something because these two snippets get indented like this
for me, running r405:
-----snip snip-----
(longer, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped) = input_list
packed_entry = (long, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped)
-----snip snip-----
which seems exactly right to me!
If you do introduce a variable to control this, please do retain the current
behavior as default.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-mode mailing list Python-mode@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
