Am 25.03.2011 16:54, schrieb Barry Warsaw:
On Mar 25, 2011, at 09:51 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
while considering the request valid, even if the current
non-indent is an option,
what's the recommendable indent?
Would not choose the block-indent step, rather signal
it's something different at stake.
What about indenting it to the end of first element of
previous line?
;;;;;;;;;;;
(longer, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped) = input_list
packed_entry = (long, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped)
;;;;;;;;;;
I must be missing something because these two snippets get indented like this
for me, running r405:
-----snip snip-----
(longer, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped) = input_list
packed_entry = (long, sequence, of_items,
that, needs, to_be, wrapped)
-----snip snip-----
which seems exactly right to me!
Noticed.
As different styles are possible, think we can deliver what has been
requested for.
If you do introduce a variable to control this, please do retain the current
behavior as default.
Okay.
Would help having an appropriate name for these indents.
What about calling the first an `left-inbound indent' --default will be
1--, the second `right-inbound-indent' --default will be (1+ column of
opening parentesis)--
Cheers,
-Barry
_______________________________________________
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode
