On Sun 09 Dec 2012 11:16:42 Mike Gabriel escribió: > Hi Luca, > > thanks for taking a look at python-pam(py). > > On So 09 Dez 2012 11:58:55 CET Luca Falavigna wrote: > > according to Debian Python policy, this package should be named > > python-pam, but > > I noticed there's one in the archive already. Could you please explain > > the reasons of introducing another one? > > As already mentioned in the ITP message[1], Python PAM (the one in > python-pampy) simply contains one single file: pam.py. That's where I > got the idea from for renaming the package to avoid a duplicate > package name in the Debian archive. (Actually this got a little > inspired by python-web, that has a home page under webpy.org). > > [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694666
JFTR: Mike has explained in the ITP bug above why it's worth to introduce this new package, it should make authentication easier compared with the already present python-pam package. Kinds regards, Lisandro. -- http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=56 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Python-modules-team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
