Making that a proprty sounds good. Just don't call it popen, that reads like a verb to me. Maybe process. On Feb 2, 2014 2:12 PM, "Victor Stinner" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I documented the new asyncio.subprocess module. While documenting the > module, I realized that most info are attributes in Process, whereas > they are getter methods in BaseSubprocessTransport (ex: > Process.returncode vs BaseSubprocessTransport.get_returncode()). The > motivation for attributes is to have an API close to subprocess.Popen. > > But there is a Process.get_subprocess(): why a method just for this? I > propose to replace it with a read-only "popen" property. > > The HTML documentation is generated once a day, it will be available at: > http://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-subprocess.html > > Or read the source: > > http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/default/Doc/library/asyncio-subprocess.rst > > Victor >
