Then 'subprocess' sounds like a good name. I really don't want to propagate the awkwardness that is Popen.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Victor Stinner <[email protected]>wrote: > 2014-02-02 Guido van Rossum <[email protected]>: > > Making that a proprty sounds good. Just don't call it popen, that reads > like > > a verb to me. Maybe process. > > In the transport, the extra info is called "subprocess". "Process" is > name of the asyncio class, whereas this name is not used in the > subprocess module. > > I would prefer "subprocess" or "popen". Process.get_subprocess() > returns a Popen instance, that's why I proposed popen. > > Victor > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
