Are you counting python bugfix releases also, right?

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's a good idea -- I'm not planning to do Tulip releases more frequently
> than Python 3 releases.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Matthew Iversen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Since it's come out with Python 3.4 and should now have a somewhat stable
>> API, you might consider calling what was released with Python 3.4.0 as
>> version 1.4.0 and simply track the minor and patch versions of python
>> releases; a testing (beta) release could be called something like 1.5.0.dev1
>> (following pep440).
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 04:15:42 UTC+11, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm curious in what context that particular change is needed and why
>>> "check out the repo" isn't appropriate there.
>>>
>>> This is *not* a rhetorical question. The answer may very well satisfy me.
>>> Making another release only takes me a few minutes -- deciding *when* to do
>>> it and what version number to use is more work.
>>>
>>> I'd actually like to have some kind of jump in the version to indicate
>>> correspondence with the Python 3.4.0 release (even though it would be the
>>> same code as 0.4.1). In the future we can then do Tulip releases that track
>>> exactly what's in future Python 3.4.x releases, from a Tulip maintenance
>>> branch.
>>>
>>> We also AFAIK haven't done any review of which Tulip changes are or
>>> aren't appropriate to merge into the Python 3.4 maintenance branch --
>>> currently nothing has been merged into it, but I suspect that's just because
>>> we've been busy. (Everything's been merged into the CPython default branch,
>>> which will become Python 3.5.)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> 2014-03-24 15:58 GMT+01:00 Andrew Svetlov <[email protected]>:
>>>>
>>>> > Would do you like to make a new release?
>>>> > PyPI has 0.4.1 as last version, that is a quite obsolete.
>>>>
>>>> I would not call "0.4.1" obsolete, since it's the same code than
>>>> Python 3.4.0 and it was released a few weeks ago. It's still young :-)
>>>>
>>>> FYI I already merged this change in Trollius, so I'm ready for a new
>>>> Trollius release.
>>>>
>>>> Victor
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
>
>
>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)



-- 
Thanks,
Andrew Svetlov

Reply via email to