Anything that has a version number in the CPython world. :-)

On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Svetlov
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Are you counting python bugfix releases also, right?
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > That's a good idea -- I'm not planning to do Tulip releases more
> frequently
> > than Python 3 releases.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Matthew Iversen <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Since it's come out with Python 3.4 and should now have a somewhat
> stable
> >> API, you might consider calling what was released with Python 3.4.0 as
> >> version 1.4.0 and simply track the minor and patch versions of python
> >> releases; a testing (beta) release could be called something like
> 1.5.0.dev1
> >> (following pep440).
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday, 25 March 2014 04:15:42 UTC+11, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm curious in what context that particular change is needed and why
> >>> "check out the repo" isn't appropriate there.
> >>>
> >>> This is *not* a rhetorical question. The answer may very well satisfy
> me.
> >>> Making another release only takes me a few minutes -- deciding *when*
> to do
> >>> it and what version number to use is more work.
> >>>
> >>> I'd actually like to have some kind of jump in the version to indicate
> >>> correspondence with the Python 3.4.0 release (even though it would be
> the
> >>> same code as 0.4.1). In the future we can then do Tulip releases that
> track
> >>> exactly what's in future Python 3.4.x releases, from a Tulip
> maintenance
> >>> branch.
> >>>
> >>> We also AFAIK haven't done any review of which Tulip changes are or
> >>> aren't appropriate to merge into the Python 3.4 maintenance branch --
> >>> currently nothing has been merged into it, but I suspect that's just
> because
> >>> we've been busy. (Everything's been merged into the CPython default
> branch,
> >>> which will become Python 3.5.)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Victor Stinner <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> 2014-03-24 15:58 GMT+01:00 Andrew Svetlov <[email protected]>:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Would do you like to make a new release?
> >>>> > PyPI has 0.4.1 as last version, that is a quite obsolete.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would not call "0.4.1" obsolete, since it's the same code than
> >>>> Python 3.4.0 and it was released a few weeks ago. It's still young :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI I already merged this change in Trollius, so I'm ready for a new
> >>>> Trollius release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Victor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Andrew Svetlov
>



-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Reply via email to