> On Nov 19, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Aymeric Augustin > <aymeric.augus...@polytechnique.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I understand the backwards-compatibility concerns. However I have to say that > the pattern: > > loop.call_soon(loop.stop) > loop.run_forever() > > seems much easier to understand and more logical than: > > loop.stop() > loop.run_forever()
I agree. I think we’re trying too hard to save a broken behaviour. "loop.stop(); loop.run_forever()” is completely non-obvious, it’s a bad practice to use stop/run_forever like this. Yury
