All tests passed, thanks! On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks!! Try the new patch. > > I'm not keen on doing the warning any more given how simple it is to > just make both idioms work. > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Svetlov > <[email protected]> wrote: >> The latest patch doesn't work also: it hangs on selector.select() call >> if no network activity but loop._stopped == True >> I suggest using zero timeout if loop._stopped is set. >> >> I agree that using loop.call_soon(loop.stop) is better but we already >> have loop.stop() usage. >> Removing the later sounds good but requires deprecation period IMHO >> (with raising a warning as GvR suggested). > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov
