i think replacing parser in aiohttp with httptools should be relatively simple task.
> On May 5, 2016, at 2:27 PM, Yury Selivanov <yseliva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ludovic, > >> On May 5, 2016, at 5:23 PM, Ludovic Gasc <gml...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hey Yury, >> >> Thanks a lot for this amazing job, it's awesome :-) >> Theses results are beyond my expectations, it was my hope when I've tried to >> benchmark aiouv. > > Thanks! > > [..] >> However, at least to me, aiohttp.web has a very good high-level API to >> deliver quickly REST APIs, I don't know if it's technically possible to have >> the same efficiency like in your benchmarks with httptools+aiohttp-like API >> (or aiohttp itself ?). > > I hope Andrew Svetlov will take a look into this if he has some time. Either > using httptools from aiohttp, or if aiohttp will have its own binding is fine > with me. I’d be glad to help. > >> >> Nevertheless, even if no efficient high level API appears on the top of >> httptools, I'll integrate that for FrameworkBenchmarks, to confirm theses >> numbers and have more implementation to compare. > > Maybe I’ll work on adding a fully-featured HTTP protocol to httptools. But I > don’t have any timeline for that yet. > >> >> Maybe, see you at EuroPython ? > > I have two talks scheduled there, so yeah ;) > > Yury >
