Ed Blake wrote: > [snip..] >> did you manage to get wx running? >> >> > > I never really tried. Every time I look at Wx it goes the same way: > I check out the demos and am wowed by the great widgets/events/applications > it can handle, then I check out the code and find that it is obtuse, sparsely > commented (for example code), and generally confusing... > > Last time I checked out Wx (~ 2 Mo. ago) things were put together better, and > the documentation was becoming rather good/complete. It just doesn't do > anything which would compel me to switch though, and it seems rather more > complicated than Tkinter. > You ought to check out Wax. It's a friendly Pythonic layer that sits atop of wx and IMHO is just as easy to use as Tkinter.
All the best, Fuzzyman http://www.voidspace.org.uk/python/index.shtml > _______________________________________________ > PythonCE mailing list > PythonCE@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce > > _______________________________________________ PythonCE mailing list PythonCE@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
