On Mar 1, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > Ed Blake wrote: >> [snip..] >>> did you manage to get wx running? >>> >>> >> >> I never really tried. Every time I look at Wx it goes the same way: >> I check out the demos and am wowed by the great widgets/events/ >> applications >> it can handle, then I check out the code and find that it is >> obtuse, sparsely >> commented (for example code), and generally confusing... >> >> Last time I checked out Wx (~ 2 Mo. ago) things were put together >> better, and >> the documentation was becoming rather good/complete. It just >> doesn't do >> anything which would compel me to switch though, and it seems >> rather more >> complicated than Tkinter. >> > You ought to check out Wax. It's a friendly Pythonic layer that sits > atop of wx and IMHO is just as easy to use as Tkinter.
Well, there is also our skinning framework - you specify the GUI in XML, but inline python is a major part of it. It was designed to allow sending an functional GUI page over jabber or some other transport. There are a lot of other interesting tools at the project as well: http://www.techgame.net/projects/framework Get it and check out the demos. Brian btw, it's BSD licensed. _______________________________________________ PythonCE mailing list PythonCE@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
