I'll chime in with a quick comment on this:
I evaluated python.net some time ago (for an OpenSimulator based project some time ago) and it worked like a charm. Unfortunately we had to stop this project for various reasons, but I have to say: it's projects like these that keep the fun going. Great work, guys!! Best, Dirk Von: pythondotnet-bounces+dirk.krause=pixelpark....@python.org [mailto:pythondotnet-bounces+dirk.krause=pixelpark....@python.org] Im Auftrag von Laszlo Sebo Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Dezember 2010 21:00 An: pythondotnet@python.org Betreff: Re: [Python.NET] building on linux, mono 2.8.1 Not a lot of traffic lately, eh? :-) In all honesty, i think python.net is a godsend. We have been using it as a core part of our pipeline for a long time now. It enables us full .net integration into a lot of tools that have python embedded in them. It allowed us to write most of our pipeline code in c# and fully reuse it in several different applications with practically no change. We are now working on integrating linux into our pipeline, so it's crucial for us to get this working, if possible :-) In the meantime, i have found that one of our target client applications (Nuke), has it's own libpython.so and if i link to that, all seems to work just dandy! Huge relief! Sadly, our other target, Maya, seems to be linking python statically... So I hope i can figure out how to get this integrated somehow... cheers, laszlo On 08/12/2010 7:47 PM, Tribble, Brett wrote: Your long self-conversation is the most interesting thing to happen to this list in a long time...
_________________________________________________ Python.NET mailing list - PythonDotNet@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythondotnet
